Wilson Leite vs Matheus Cury Bueres Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L W L
Form
L L W W L L W W L LCara A Cara: Leite 1 - 0 Bueres
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Leite victoriosa 2 y Bueres victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Leite y Bueres fue en el Campinas Challenger, el 04-10-2022, Cuartos de First, Clay, con Wilson Leite obteniendo la victoria 6-3 6-4
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wilson Leite | 1 |
| Matheus Cury Bueres | 0 |
Campinas Challenger(04-10-2022)
6
3
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Wilson Leite
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
| 12 | Juegos Ganados | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Faltas dobles totales | 2 |
| 1:23:23 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:23:23 |
| 54% (29/54) | % De Primer Servicio | 66% (31/47) |
| 66% (19/29) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 58% (18/31) |
| 68% (17/25) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 31% (5/16) |
| 80% (4/5) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 51% (24/47) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 33% (18/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Wilson Leite
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Conner Huertas Del Pino
Player
Wilson Leite
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Zeitune
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Wilson Leite
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Paul Valsecchi
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Wilson Leite
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Bautista Vilicich
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Wilson Leite
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Wilson Leite
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Juan Manuel La Serna
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Matheus Cury Bueres
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel La Serna
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
41%
(
23 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Torrealba
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Cury Bueres
Player
Luka Bojicic Ono
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Tumasonis
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-6(5) 10-6 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (412/441) | Win/Loss | 47% (38/43) |
| 49% (950/1004) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (80/97) |
| 50% (8983/9051) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (806/830) |
| 44% (54/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) |
| 49% (354/363) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (25/33) |
| 31% (4/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 749 | Aces Total | 17 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 870 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
| 1:13:38 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 530.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 156.31 |
| 62% (23800/38506) | 1st Serve % | 71% (1615/2271) |
| 62% (14809/23800) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (953/1615) |
| 49% (7188/14706) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (268/656) |
| 45% (1893/4197) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (86/204) |
| 42% (16113/38030) | Return Points Win % | 39% (900/2303) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (85/129) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/9) |
| 51% (323/307) | Futures W/L | 53% (38/34) |
| 48% (405/843) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (36/78) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (90/193) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 48% (120/251) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (12/18) |
| 83% (415/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (37/32) |
| 17% (415/69) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (37/4) |
| 15% (438/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (44/6) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
